New Mexico In Focus
Avangrid Merger, Film Set Tragedy & ABQ Stadium Opinions
Season 15 Episode 18 | 56m 20sVideo has Closed Captions
Potential Merger Avangrid’s Track Record, Film Set Tragedy & Downtown ABQ Stadium Opinions
There's a proposed merger between PNM Resources and Avangrid. People offer opinions on a proposed multi-use stadium slated for Downtown Albuquerque. The Line opinion panel offers thoughts on next Tuesday’s municipal elections, the accidental shooting on a NM film set and the legislation that allows retired law enforcement officers to reenter the workforce, while collecting pensions.
Problems playing video? | Closed Captioning Feedback
Problems playing video? | Closed Captioning Feedback
New Mexico In Focus is a local public television program presented by NMPBS
New Mexico In Focus
Avangrid Merger, Film Set Tragedy & ABQ Stadium Opinions
Season 15 Episode 18 | 56m 20sVideo has Closed Captions
There's a proposed merger between PNM Resources and Avangrid. People offer opinions on a proposed multi-use stadium slated for Downtown Albuquerque. The Line opinion panel offers thoughts on next Tuesday’s municipal elections, the accidental shooting on a NM film set and the legislation that allows retired law enforcement officers to reenter the workforce, while collecting pensions.
Problems playing video? | Closed Captioning Feedback
How to Watch New Mexico In Focus
New Mexico In Focus is available to stream on pbs.org and the free PBS App, available on iPhone, Apple TV, Android TV, Android smartphones, Amazon Fire TV, Amazon Fire Tablet, Roku, Samsung Smart TV, and Vizio.
Providing Support for PBS.org
Learn Moreabout PBS online sponsorshipFUNDING FOR NEW MEXICO FOCUS PROVIDED BY THE MCCUNE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION AND VIEWERS LIKE YOU.
Gene: THIS WEEK ON NEW MEXICO IN FOCUS, A POTENTIAL PNM MERGER COMES WITH A PROMISE OF RENEWABLE FUTURE.
WHAT DO WE REALLY KNOW ABOUT THE UTILITY'S NEW PARTNER?
Andrews: IF I AM IN NEW MEXICO I WANT TO ASK AVINGRID, HOW ARE YOU GOING TO GUARANTEE THAT YOU UNDERSTAND OUR SPECIFIC ENERGY NEEDS.
Gene: PLUS MAKING THE CASE FOR AND AGAINST THE NEW DOWNTOWN ALBUQUERQUE MULTI-USE STADIUM WHICH WOULD BE HOME TO THE NEW MEXICO UNITED SOCCER TEAM.
NEW MEXICO IN FOCUS STARTS NOW.
THANKS FOR JOINING US THIS WEEK, I AM YOUR HOST GENE GRANT.
WE HAVE INVITED A GROUP OF FOUR INDIVIDUALS TO MAKE THEIR CASE FOR AND AGAINST THE STADIUM PROPOSALS AND WE WILL SPRINKLE THOSE OPINIONS THROUGHOUT THE SHOW THIS WEEK.
THE LINE OPINION PANEL WILL ALSO DISCUSS THE POTENTIAL RETURN OF DOUBLE DIPPING FOR RETIRED POLICE OFFICERS, AS A WAY TO COMBAT THE STATE'S ONGOING CRIME WAVE AND THE PANEL DISCUSSES WHAT SAFETY CHANGES MAY BE IN STORE FOR THE FILM INDUSTRY AFTER A TRAGIC SHOOTING ON THE SET OF THE FILM, RUSH, INVOLVING ACTOR ALEC BALDWIN.
BUT WE START TONIGHT WITH SOME LAST THOUGHTS AND PREDICTIONS FROM THE LINE AHEAD OF TUESDAY'S TRIP TO THE POLLS.
WE ARE JUST FOUR DAYS AWAY FROM GLUEING YOUR EYES TO PHONES AND TELEVISIONS WAITING FOR THE RESULTS IN NEXT WEEK'S ELECTIONS.
TWO MAYORAL SEATS IN THE STATE'S TWO LARGEST CITIES, EDUCATION FUNDING AND A DIVISIVE STADIUM BOND PROPOSAL ARE ALL UP FOR A VOTE.
LET'S BRING IN THE LINE THIS WEEK STARTING WITH REGULAR TOM GARRITY OF THE GARRITY GROUP PUBLIC RELATIONS.
WE ALSO WELCOME BACK TO THE ZOOM ROUND TABLE, FORMER STATE SENATOR ERIC GRIEGO.
ALWAYS GOOD TO HAVE ERIC.
AND JOINING US AGAIN THIS WEEK IS REBECCA LATHAM, SHE IS CEO GIRL SCOUTS OF NEW MEXICO AND FORMER HEAD OF THE NEW MEXICO TOURISM DEPARTMENT UNDER GOVERNOR SUSANA MARTINEZ.
WELCOME TO YOU ALL.
THE ALBUQUERQUE MAYOR'S RACE HAS CAPTURED A LOT OF HEADLINES IN THE LAST COUPLE OF WEEKS, INCLUDING RECENT POLLING OF THE ALBUQUERQUE JOURNAL THAT SHOWS INCUMBENT MAYOR TIM KELLER WITH A SIZEABLE LEAD OVER CHALLENGERS, BERNALILLO COUNTY SHERIFF, MANNY GONZALES, AND TALK RADIO HOST, EDDY ARAGON.
WITH MORE THAN 50% OF THE VOTE, DO KELLER'S CHALLENGERS HAVE A CHANCE TO TAKE OUT A BIG ENOUGH CHUNK TO FORCE A RUNOFF?
ERIC, LET ME START WITH YOU ON THAT QUESTION.
IS THAT ACTUALLY GOING TO BE HAPPENING HERE?
WE HAVE FOUR DAYS TO GO.
WHAT DO YOU SEE AS POSSIBLE FOR THE CHALLENGERS?
Eric: WELL, I THINK IF KELLER'S FOLKS SHOW UP, HE IS IN GOOD SHAPE.
I MEAN SADLY THE RACE HAS TAKEN SOME PRETTY DARK TURNS IN THE LAST COUPLE OF WEEKS.
YOU KNOW, AND I THINK THAT NOT JUST THE POLLING THAT WE SAW FROM THE JOURNAL BUT THE KIND OF ENDORSEMENT THAT YOU REALLY SEE SOME PRETTY HEAVY HITTERS RALLYING AROUND THE MAYOR, INCLUDING THE GOVERNOR AND ATTORNEY GENERAL BALDERAS, SO IT IS CLEAR THEY ARE TRYING TO SEND A CLEAR SIGNAL THAT HE IS THE DEMOCRAT, EVEN THOUGH THIS IS A NONPARTISAN RACE.
I THINK MANNY GONZALES, HIS DESCENT INTO THE GUTTER ON PERSONAL STUFF HAS JUST REALLY TANKED ANY CHANCE HE HAD OF FORCING A RUNOFF.
I THINK HIS STRATEGY WAS TO TRY TO TAKE THE MAYOR DOWN A NOTCH AND TRY TO GET IN A RUNOFF WITH HIM AND THEN A HAIL MARY EFFORT TO WIN IN A RUNOFF.
I THINK HE REALLY BLEW IT AND AT THE END OF THE DAY, I THINK MOST FOLKS JUST WANT TO SEE A CREDIBLE, COMPETENT PERSON RUNNING THE OFFICE AND GIVEN HOW THIS CAMPAIGN HAS GONE, WHETHER YOU LOVE KELLER OR NOT, I THINK IT HAS BEEN CLEAR THAT IF YOU CAN'T RUN -- IF YOU CAN'T RUN A CREDIBLE CAMPAIGN, AS BOTH MANNY AND ARAGON HAVE SHOWN THAT NEITHER ONE HAS RUN THAT STRONG OF A CAMPAIGN, HOW ARE YOU GOING TO RUN A MAJOR AMERICAN CITY?
SO, I THINK KELLER IS IN GOOD SHAPE.
HIS PEOPLE HAVE TO SHOW UP.
I HOPE PEOPLE DON'T THINK IT IS KIND OF OVER BECAUSE THERE COULD STILL BE A RUNOFF IF KELLER'S FOLKS DON'T SHOW UP.
Gene: REBECCA, OF COURSE, SENATOR MENTIONED MR. GONZALES' UNSUBSTANTIATED ACCUSATIONS AGAINST MAYOR KELLER DURING THAT KOB DEBATE.
HIS LAST DITCH EFFORT TO TIGHTEN THE GAP.
FOLLOW-UP IF YOU WOULD ABOUT WHAT ERIC JUST MENTIONED.
WHAT IS HE GOING TO GET OUT OF THIS IN THE LAST LESS THAN A WEEK TO GO HERE?
Rebecca: I AM STILL SCRATCHING MY HEAD ABOUT THAT TACTIC.
I THINK THAT THE SHERIFF'S BETTER APPROACH WOULD HAVE BEEN TO TRY AND DISMANTLE THE REPUTATION OF ARAGON.
YOU KNOW, WE CAN NEVER UNDERESTIMATE THE ABILITY OF A THIRD PERSON TO JUST COMPLETELY SHAKE EVERYTHING UP AND RUIN ANY ACTUAL CHANCE FOR CHANGE.
YOU KNOW, I THINK ONE THING, TWO THINGS THAT THE CITY OF ALBUQUERQUE CAN AGREE ON IS WE NEED TO FIND A SOLUTION TO OUR UNHOUSED POPULATION AND WE NEED TO FIND A SOLUTION TO OUR CRIME.
IF WE ALL AGREE ON THE MAJOR ISSUES, WHY CAN'T WE AGREE ON, YOU KNOW, HOW TO FIX THEM?
I JUST KEEP LOOKING AT EDDY AND THINKING, YOU KNOW, SOMETIMES WHEN YOU WANT CHANGE IT MEANS YOU HAVE GOT TO DISCREETLY GET OUT OF YOUR OWN WAY AND HIS BEING IN THE RACE REALLY, TO ME, AS A VOTER, SHOWED HE WAS PUTTING HIS PRIDE OVER ACTUAL PROGRESS BECAUSE IF YOU WANT CHANGE, YOU HAVE GOT TO ACTUALLY STRATEGICALLY LOOK AT THE BEST WAY TO GET THERE.
FRANKLY, I THINK MANNY PROBABLY SHOULD HAVE TRIED TO DISMANTLE THAT APPROACH AND TRIED TO SWAY SOME OF THOSE LIKELY EDDY VOTERS BACK OVER TO HIM THEN TRY AND DAMAGE THE MAYOR'S CREDIBILITY OVER UNSUBSTANTIATED CLAIMS.
Gene: INTERESTING POINT.
AND TOM I GOT TO GET YOU IN ON THIS AND I WANT TO SWING NORTH OF SANTA FE IN A SECOND.
BUT FOR EDDY ARAGON AND MR. GONZALES, PICK UP WHERE REBECCA WAS.
THAT IS ACTUALLY FASCINATING.
DID HE BLOW THE MOMENT, MEANING THE SHERIFF, BY NOT GOING OFF THE THIRD PARTY, THIRD PERSON?
Tom: IN A THREE-HORSE RACE, WHICH I'LL JUST USE THAT ANALOGY FOR THE PURPOSES OF OUR CONVERSATION TODAY, BOTH ERIC AND REBECCA BRING UP SOLID POINTS.
I THINK THAT MANNY AND EDDY'S APPROACH, MR. ARAGON AND MR. GONZALES' APPROACH, HAVE BEEN OFF BECAUSE THEY HAVE BEEN GOING FOR, YOU KNOW, THE HEAD ON OF TRYING TO DE-THROWN AN INCUMBENT MAYOR, WHICH IS DIFFICULT.
CLEARLY HE IS VERY POPULAR.
WHETHER PEOPLE AGREE OR DON'T, PEOPLE LIKE HIM OTHER THAN THE OTHER TWO.
SO, I THINK THERE IS A LOT THAT WAS LOST IN ALL THE DEBATES BY MR. ARAGON AND MR. GONZALES, TO NOT TAKE EACH OTHER DOWN, TO TRY AND BUILD MORE OF A BASE TO FORCE A RUNOFF.
NOW, BECAUSE OF MR. GONZALES' COMMENTS DURING THE LAST DEBATE WHICH I THINK THE PUBLIC SENTIMENT IS ACTUALLY REFLECTED IN THE ALBUQUERQUE JOURNAL POLLING.
YOU KNOW, IT DOES NOT SHAPE UP WELL FOR EITHER OF THE TWO NONINCUMBENTS.
Gene: NOW, LET'S TURN TO SANTA FE, THE ALREADY EXTRAORDINARY FUND RAISING GAP BETWEEN THE THREE CANDIDATES IS GROWING EVEN WIDER.
YOU MIGHT HAVE READ ABOUT THIS.
INCUMBENT ALAN WEBBER HAS RECEIVED MORE THAN 440,000 ACCORDING TO LATEST FINANCE REPORT FROM THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE.
THAT DWARFS THE LESS THAN 100 GRAND RAISED BY JOANNE VIGIL COPPER AND LESS THAN 20,000 TAKEN IN BY ALEXIS MARTINEZ JOHNSON.
THAT IS A BIG GAP.
DOES MONEY MAKE OR BREAK THIS RACE AND IF IT DOES MAKE IT, THAT DOESN'T FEEL VERY SANTA FE, YOU KNOW, THAT IDEA THAT YOU CAN STEAMROLL EVERYBODY WITH A TON OF DOUGH.
WHAT IS YOUR SENSE OF THIS ONE?
Eric: SANTA FE HAD A PUBLIC FINANCING SYSTEM THAT REALLY DIDN'T WORK OUT TOO WELL.
IT WAS MODELED ON THE ALBUQUERQUE SYSTEM THAT WE HAVE THAT ACTUALLY MAYOR KELLER IS USING PRETTY EFFECTIVELY.
ONE OF THE REASONS WHY IT WORKED, THE VOTERS CHANGED IT TO ALLOW FOR A MUCH MORE SIGNIFICANT INVESTMENT IN PUBLIC FINANCE.
IF YOU BELIEVE WE HAVE TO TAKE SOME OF THE BIG MONEY, SOME OF THE DEVELOPMENT MONEY AND SPECIAL INTEREST MONEY OUT OF LOCAL ELECTIONS YOU HAVE ALTERNATIVES.
IN ALBUQUERQUE THERE IS AN ALTERNATIVE.
YOU KNOW THE MAYOR, YOU KNOW, 600,000 PLUS IN PUBLIC FUNDING DIDN'T HAVE TO MAKE A BUNCH OF CALLS TO PEOPLE WHO WANT BUSINESS WITH THE CITY.
BUT IN SANTA FE, UNFORTUNATELY, THEY COULDN'T EVER FIGURE OUT HOW TO GET THE SYSTEM TO WORK AND TO BE SUBSTANTIAL ENOUGH TO ALLOW PEOPLE TO RUN CREDIBLY, SO, ALAN WEBBER IS A LONG-TIME NATIONALLY KNOWN COMPANY FOUNDER, A BUSINESS GUY BUT ALSO VERY PROGRESSIVE, LIKE THE ELECTORATE IN SANTA FE.
SO, YES, HE RAISED A LOT OF MONEY.
I ALSO THINK A LOT OF PEOPLE JUST SEE HIM AS NOT UNLIKE THE KELLER RACE, AS THE MOST COMPETENT PERSON IN THE RACE.
THEY MAY NOT LOVE HIM, THEY MAY THINK HE HAS MADE A COUPLE OF MISTAKES, BUT OVERALL HE COMES ACROSS AND HE HAS GOVERNED AS A PRETTY PROGRESSIVE, THOUGHTFUL GUY AND HE HAS BENEFITED FROM THE SAME THING KELLER IS WHICH BOTH OF HIS OPPONENTS ARE NOT RUNNING GREAT RACES AND NEITHER SEEMS TO HAVE A CLEAR MESSAGE OTHER THAN I AM NOT THE INCUMBENT, RIGHT.
ALEXIS MARTINEZ JOHNSON THIS IS HER THIRD OR FOURTH TIME RUNNING AND NOT A VERY EFFECTIVE CAMPAIGN AND THE MAIN OPPONENT FROM THE COUNCIL IS JOANNE COPPLER VIGIL REALLY IS ALL OVER THE BOARD.
SHE OPPOSED MASK MANDATES AND THEN SHE HAS REALLY KIND OF FOUGHT SOME BASIC REAL ESTATE REFORM AS A REALTOR.
SO, I THINK BOTH KELLER AND WEBBER SHARE A COMMON THREAD WHICH IS THEY ARE PROGRESSIVE, THEY ARE COMPETENT AND THEY ARE RUNNING AGAINST REALLY BAD CANDIDATES.
Gene: GOOD POINT THERE.
GOT TO GET INTO THE STADIUM BONDS HERE.
THE MEASURE HAS BECOME THE MOST TALKED ABOUT PROPOSAL ON ANY BALLOT AROUND THE STATE.
A RECENT POLL FROM THE JOURNAL SHOWS THAT MORE THAN HALF OF VOTERS ARE OPPOSED.
ONLY ABOUT 37% ARE IN FAVOR.
WHAT IS ESPECIALLY INTERESTING IS NEARLY EVERYONE HAS MADE UP THEIR MIND WITH 3% SAYING, IT DEPENDS.
AND 4% SAYING THEY ARE UNDECIDED.
TOM, DID THE CITY FUMBLE THIS AND HOW SOON BEFORE THEY TAKE ANOTHER CRACK AT GETTING A STADIUM SOME OTHER WAYS IF THE VOTERS DO TURN IT DOWN?
Tom: IT IS CLEAR THAT EVERYBODY THOUGHT THERE WAS GOING TO BE A BANDWAGON AND IT TURNED OUT TO BE MORE OF A RED FLYER AS FAR AS THE NEW MEXICO UNITED TEAM.
A VERY GOOD TEAM, A WELL RUN FRANCHISE.
THE TIMING JUST I DON'T THINK WAS RIGHT AND THAT IS WHAT REFLECTED, I THINK, IN THE POLLING NUMBERS WE ARE SEEING IN THE ALBUQUERQUE JOURNAL.
THE QUESTION IS WHAT HAPPENS ON ELECTION DAY?
IT ALL DEPENDS WHO SHOWS UP.
I THINK IN ADDITION TO MAYOR KELLER'S REELECTION THAT THE CITY COUNCIL AND PROBABLY THE MAYOR'S OFFICE WILL END UP FINDING ANOTHER WAY TO FUND THE NEW MEXICO UNITED STADIUM AND HOPEFULLY WHEN THAT IS DONE, YOU KNOW, IT IS SOMETHING THAT TAKES ALL COMMUNITIES INTO CONSIDERATION.
Gene: REBECCA, THE UNITED FOLKS, I THINK THEY ARE JUST UNDER A MILLION DOLLARS IN THEIR PARTICULAR BUCKET OF MONEY TO SPEND AROUND THE MARKET.
37% AFTER 850,000 PLUS, JUST WHAT DIDN'T CONNECT HERE?
SOMETHING DIDN'T QUITE CONNECT.
Rebecca: I WAS SPEAKING TO SOMEONE EARLIER ABOUT THIS AND I ASKED THAT VERY QUESTION, LIKE, WHAT IS IT THAT YOU'RE NOT -- YOU KNOW -- THAT IS DRIVING YOUR OPPOSITION TO THIS AND THE STATEMENT WAS THAT THE SPECIFIC FIGURE 280 FULL-TIME JOBS AND THE QUESTION OF IS THAT REALISTIC?
AND TO THE PERSON WHO I WAS SPEAKING WITH, THEY SAID, IF I CAN'T TRUST THAT PARTICULAR STATEMENT, 280 FULL-TIME JOBS, BECAUSE I THINK SOMEWHERE I READ THAT THE AVERAGE PROFESSIONAL SOCCER TEAM EMPLOYED 75 PEOPLE.
SO, 280 FULL-TIME YEAR-ROUND JOBS.
SO THE PERSON SAID IF I CAN'T TRUST THAT FIGURE, I DON'T TRUST ANY OF IT.
ALL OF IT SEEMS SHADY BECAUSE I DON'T KNOW WHERE THEY ARE GOING TO COME UP WITH THOSE 280 JOBS.
OVERALL, THOUGH, REGARDLESS OF HOW THIS GOES, I THINK IT IS REALLY IMPORTANT THAT WE AS A COMMUNITY, NO.
1, REALIZE IF THIS DOESN'T PASS NOW OR DOESN'T HAPPEN NOW, THAT DOESN'T MEAN IT IS NEVER GOING TO HAPPEN.
IT JUST MEANS THIS ISN'T THE RIGHT TIME FOR THE COMMUNITY.
THE OTHER THING WE NEED TO REALIZE, THERE IS, IF WE DON'T SUPPORT UNITED, THEY WILL LEAVE.
I THINK WE HAVE TO DO A BETTER JOB OF SUPPORTING THAT ORGANIZATION.
EVERYTHING THAT UNITED HAS DONE FOR ALBUQUERQUE AND FOR NEW MEXICO HAS BEEN AMAZING.
I MEAN LIKE I DON'T EVEN LIKE SOCCER AND I HAVE GOT NEW MEXICO UNITED APPAREL AND STICKERS AND POSTERS IN MY HOUSE, SO, WHAT THEY BRING TO US AS A COMMUNITY IS SO GOOD.
WE HAVE GOT TO CONTINUE TO NURTURE THAT AND GROW THAT AND GET IT TO A POINT WHERE IF THE STADIUM DOESN'T HAPPEN NOW, HOW DO WE GET IT THAT IT IS MORE ORGANIC AND THAT EVERYBODY FEELS BETTER ABOUT IT.
Eric: REAL QUICK.
WE ARE JUST SHORT ON TIME.
50% OF THE FOLKS ALSO ARE NOT CRAZY ABOUT THE LOCATIONS PARTICULARLY BARELAS.
DID WE MESS THAT UP BY NARROWING IT TO TWO LOCATIONS?
Eric: I DON'T THINK THAT FEASIBILITY STUDY WAS CARRIED OUT VERY WELL.
I THINK IT IS THE SAME PROBLEM, I ACTUALLY AGREE WITH REBECCA ON THIS, THEY TOOK THIS VERY MUCH JOB CONSTRUCTION FOCUS.
I DON'T THINK THAT WAS THE RIGHT MESSAGE.
THEIR BRAND HAS BEEN BRINGING US TOGETHER.
WE HAVE HUGE CRIME PROBLEMS.
I THINK IF THEY LEANED INTO THAT WE ARE UNITED, THIS IS A WAY FOR US TO COME TOGETHER, THEY MIGHT HAVE HAD A SHOT.
IN ANY YEAR, A 50 MILLION DOLLAR BOND FOR A PRIVATE PUBLICALLY-OWNED BUT PRIVATELY RUN STADIUM IS A TOUGH ACT BUT I THINK THEY MADE A BAD CALL WHEN THEY DECIDED TO TRY TO GET THE REPUBLICAN CONSERVATIVE VOTERS WHO ARE NOT GOING TO SUPPORT THIS KIND OF BOND ANYWAY, AND THEY REALLY SHOULD HAVE MADE A PLAY FOR THE YOUNGER FOLKS FOR THE FOLKS WHO ARE ON THE FENCE, PEOPLE LIKE ME WHO LIVE IN BARELAS WHO SAY, WELL, IT DEPENDS, IF YOU'RE REALLY WILLING TO BRING THE COMMUNITY INTO THIS AND YOU REALLY WANT TO SORT OF MAKE CHANGES TO THE COMMUNITY LEVEL AND BRING US TOGETHER, THEN I AM OPEN TO THE IDEA.
IF THE PLAY IS TO FANS ONLY, TO SORT OF BUSINESS FOLKS ONLY, CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ONLY, THAT ISN'T A MESSAGE.
I GOT A TON OF THOSE MAILERS AND THEY WERE NOT CONVINCING.
Gene: YEAH.
IT WAS A POLITICAL CAMPAIGN INSTEAD OF A HEARTS AND MIND CAMPAIGN.
Eric: EXACTLY.
Gene: BE SURE TO JOIN US HERE AT NEW MEXICO PBS FOR ELECTION NIGHT ANALYSIS AND WE'LL CATCH BACK UP WITH THE LINE IN LESS THAN FIVE MINUTES WITH THEIR THOUGHTS ON THE TRAGEDY INVOLVING ALEC BALDWIN ON THE SET RUST.
BUT FIRST, MORE ON THAT PROPOSAL TO BUILD A NEW SOCCER STADIUM IN ALBUQUERQUE WE WERE JUST TALKING ABOUT.
THROUGHOUT TODAY'S SHOW WE ARE GOING TO HEAR FROM COMMUNITY LEADERS AND ORGANIZERS WITH FIRSTHAND PERSPECTIVE.
FIRST WE REACHED OUT TO THE TEAM AT THE CENTER OF THIS, NEW MEXICO UNITED, TO SEE HOW IT PLANS ON ACCOMPLISHING THE ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY GOALS REBECCA MENTIONED, IT SAYS WILL BE POSSIBLE WITH A NEW STADIUM.
THEY PUT US IN TOUCH WITH A YOUNG WOMAN WHO IS A PART OF THIS INITIATIVE EARLY ON AND SEES IT AS A WAY TO MOVE THE CITY FORWARD.
Nava: MY NAME IS CINDY NAVA.
I AM A FORMER DACA RECIPIENT, A LONG-TIME ORGANIZER AND POLICY ADVOCATE, A SMALL BUSINESS OWNER AND A NEW U.S. CITIZEN AS OF FEBRUARY 22 OF THIS YEAR.
MY LIVED EXPERIENCES HAVE SHAPED MY WORK AND THE LENS I SEE LIFE THROUGH.
I CAME TO NEW MEXICO WHEN I WAS SEVEN YEARS OLD FROM CHIHUAHUA, MEXICO.
GROWING UP AS AN UNDOCUMENTED IMMIGRANT WAS BY NO MEANS AN EASY TASK, HOWEVER, I ALWAYS FELT LUCKY TO LIVE IN A STATE LIKE NEW MEXICO WHICH ALLOWED ME TO BREAK MANY OF THE BARRIERS THAT I WAS FACED WITH.
WE ARE ALL SHAPED BY OUR UPBRINGING AND I AM NO DIFFERENT.
MY PROGRESSIVE VALUES RUN DEEP, BORNE OUT OF LIVING IN THE INJUSTICES ROOTED SO DEEPLY IN U.S. IMMIGRATION POLICIES.
AS SOMEONE WHO HAS ADVOCATED FOR ISSUES THAT AFFECT OUR COMMUNITIES EACH AND EVERYDAY, I SPEAK FROM A PLACE OF LIVED EXPERIENCE THAT HAS LED WITH ADVOCACY FOR CHANGE THAT SUPPORTS AND BENEFITS OUR COMMUNITIES AS A WHOLE.
I BELIEVE THE STADIUM BOND DESERVES OUR SUPPORT ON NOVEMBER 2.
NEW MEXICO UNITED DOES THINGS DIFFERENTLY AND THE STADIUM BOND FOLLOWED THE SAME PATH.
LAST YEAR, I MET WITH UNITED ABOUT HOSTING A CITIZENSHIP EVENT AT A MATCH TO BRING ATTENTION TO THE GROUNDBREAKING WORK AND CONTRIBUTIONS THAT IMMIGRANTS MAKE EACH AND EVERY DAY ACROSS OUR STATE.
THIS MONTH, THAT IDEA BECAME A REALITY.
AND I HAD THE PLEASURE OF PARTICIPATING IN THAT CEREMONY, WELCOMING 15 NEW AMERICANS ON THE FIELD DURING A UNITED GAME.
THIS, ON THE SHOULDERS OF GAMES WHERE NEW MEXICO UNITED CELEBRATED AND PROMOTED BLACK LIVES MATTER AND PRIDE.
THIS ACTION TO ME WAS MORE THAN A STATEMENT.
IT WAS THE ENACTMENT OF A CONVERSATION WE HAD TURNED INTO ACTION WITH A BROADER PURPOSE OF REPRESENTATION AND INCLUSION THAT OPENS AND EXPANDS OPPORTUNITIES TO BE INNOVATIVE IF GIVEN THE OPPORTUNITY TO MAKE THIS STADIUM A REALITY.
AS SOMEONE WHO GREW UP IN ALBUQUERQUE, SURROUNDED BY SOCCER DIEHARDS AND ONE WHO HAS SEEN THE DEEP IMPACT OF UNITED PLAYING A FOUNDATIONAL ROLE IN BRINGING TOGETHER OUR DIVERSE AND MULTICULTURAL COMMUNITIES UNDER THE PREMISE OF SOMOS UNIDOS, THERE IS AN INTANGIBLE QUALITY TO.
THE STADIUM WILL BRING EXTENSIVE OPPORTUNITIES FOR CREATIVE AND CULTURALLY COMPETENT ENGAGEMENT WITH COMMUNITIES THAT ARE NOT ALWAYS BROUGHT TO THE TABLE.
COMMUNITIES SUCH AS THE ONES I GREW UP IN AND DEEPLY UNDERSTAND.
IT WILL CREATE AN AFFORDABLE FAMILY ACTIVITY WHERE WE CAN GATHER, HAVE FUN, CELEBRATE BIRTHDAYS AND GRADUATIONS AND THIS IS OUR OPPORTUNITY TO REIMAGINE AND REDEFINE WHAT THE STADIUM COULD BE AND WHAT IT COULD BRING TO OUR STATE.
AN OPPORTUNITY TO EXPAND ITS MULTI-USE ABILITIES, TO SERVE OUR COMMUNITIES THROUGH COLLABORATIVE EFFORTS THAT PROVIDE RESOURCES, FOOD DRIVES, OPEN PARK ACCESS, BLOOD DRIVES, CITIZENSHIP CEREMONIES, HEALTH FAIRS AND SO MUCH MORE.
Andrews: WHEN PEOPLE ARE TALKING ABOUT AVINGRID, THEY ARE USUALLY TALKING ABOUT IT THROUGH PERSPECTIVE OF THE CORRIDOR, HOW THIS COMPANY DOESN'T CARE ABOUT ITS MAIN CUSTOMERS BECAUSE THEY ARE SUCH A SMALL PERCENTAGE OF THEIR EARNINGS OVERALL.
NO GUARANTEES THEY ARE GOING TO HAVE YOUR BEST INTEREST IN MIND WHEN IT COMES TO THIS.
Gene: NEW MEXICO IS CURRENTLY IN THE NATIONAL ENTERTAINMENT INDUSTRY SPOTLIGHT BUT FOR A TRAGIC REASON YOU KNOW ABOUT.
IT WAS A WEEK AGO WE LEARNED THAT ACTOR ALEC BALDWIN HAD ACCIDENTALLY SHOT AND KILLED A CINEMATOGRAPHER ON THE SET OF HIS NEW FILM RUST.
SHOOTING AT THE BONANZA CREEK RANCH OF SANTA FE, OF COURSE.
THE DIRECTOR WAS ALSO INJURED BUT HE IS RECOVERING.
IN THE DAYS SINCE THERE HAS BEEN A LOT OF REPORTING ON THE SAFETY AND WORK CONDITIONS ON SET AND JUST YESTERDAY WE GOT AN UPDATE ON THE INVESTIGATION FROM THE SANTA FE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE AMONG OTHER THINGS.
INVESTIGATORS HAVE ESTABLISHED A LIVE ROUND WAS FIRED FROM THE PROP GUN AND CRIMINAL CHARGES ARE STILL A POSSIBILITY IN THIS CASE.
REBECCA, STILL WAITING TO HEAR IF BELOW THE LINE FILMMAKERS WILL RATIFY A NEW AGREEMENT OVER WORKPLACE CONDITIONS AFTER A NEAR STRIKE TWO WEEKS AGO.
BUT, THIS TRAGEDY REALLY HIGHLIGHTS SOME OF THE ISSUES WRAPPED UP IN THOSE NEGOTIATIONS.
THE QUESTION HAS TO BE ASKED, ARE FILM SETS IN NEW MEXICO GOING TO BE FUNDAMENTALLY SAFER, CAN THEY BE FUNDAMENTALLY SAFER?
IF NOT, WHY?
WHY NOT?
Rebecca: WELL, I THINK WE HAVE TO BE VERY CAREFUL ABOUT MAKING THIS A NEW MEXICO ISSUE VERSUS MAKING THIS A FILM INDUSTRY STANDARD.
THE FILM INDUSTRY ABSOLUTELY NEEDS TO ADOPT MORE SAFETY STANDARDS BECAUSE THIS IS THE MOST HORRIFIC TRAGEDY.
WHAT WE HAVE TO BE CAREFUL ABOUT IS IF WE MAKE THIS A NEW MEXICO ISSUE, ONCE THE GOVERNOR GETS INVOLVED, ONCE THE LEGISLATURE GETS INVOLVED, IF WE MAKE IT ANY HARDER TO SHOOT IN NEW MEXICO ARE WE BITING THE HAND THAT FEEDS US?
I FEEL LIKE, YOU KNOW, HORRIBLE ACCIDENTS, THIS IS DEFINITELY SOMEONE WAS NEGLIGENT HERE.
MULTIPLE PEOPLE APPEAR TO HAVE BEEN NEGLIGENT.
I JUST DON'T THINK THIS CAN BE SOMETHING THAT WE STAND UP FIRST AND SAY, LIKE, WELL, THIS IS WHAT NEW MEXICO IS GOING TO DO.
I DO FEEL LIKE THE GOVERNOR SAID IF THE FILM INDUSTRY DOESN'T DO SOMETHING WE WILL GET INVOLVED BUT AT THIS POINT I STILL WOULD SAY, LIKE, LET'S HOLD OFF A LITTLE BIT AND SEE HOW THE INDUSTRY WORKS IT OUT AMONG THEMSELVES.
Gene: TOM, WE NOW KNOW THAT LIVE ROUNDS WERE ALL OVER THIS SET AND THIS SEEMS UNFATHOMABLE IN SO MANY WAYS.
INVESTIGATORS ARE TRYING TO ESTABLISH IN FACT IF THOSE GUNS WERE USED FOR TARGET SHOOT DURING DOWN TIME.
IT SOUNDS LIKE THEY DID FROM WHAT WE ARE GLEANING.
WHAT SORTS OF SAFETY CHANGES, YOU KNOW, CAN COME OUT OF THIS INDUSTRY WIDE AS REBECCA WAS SAYING?
IS THERE ANYTHING THE INDUSTRY CAN DO VERSUS THE POLITICAL SIDE?
Tom: THERE IS A LOT OF LEEWAY GIVEN TO THE FILM INDUSTRY BECAUSE A LOT OF US WE JUST DON'T UNDERSTAND WHAT THE INDUSTRY IS ALL ABOUT.
WE PAY OUR ADMISSION TO GO SEE THE MOVIE, WE ARE ENTERTAINED, WE THINK IT IS PRETTY COOL WHEN THE STARS COME INTO TOWN AND STUFF BUT AS FAR AS ACTUALLY HOW A MOVIE IS PRODUCED, I THINK WE HAVE ALL LEARNED A LITTLE BIT MORE ABOUT THE ROLE OF AN ARMORER, ABOUT THE ROLE OF CINEMATOGRAPHER AND HOPEFULLY WE SHOULD HAVE LEARNED MORE ABOUT IT UNDER DIFFERENT CIRCUMSTANCES, BUT NOW THESE ARE THE CIRCUMSTANCES THAT WE HAVE AND I THINK THE INDUSTRY, IT IS REALLY ON THE INDUSTRY TO SAY, OKAY, HOW ARE WE GOING TO FIX THIS?
HOW ARE WE GOING TO MAKE SURE THE GOVERNMENT DOESN'T COME IN, WHETHER IT IS CALIFORNIA, NEW MEXICO OR GEORGIA, YOU KNOW, THE INDUSTRY REALLY HAS TO DECIDE HOW THEY ARE GOING TO CHANGE THINGS.
IF THEY DON'T, THEN THAT IS WHERE WE WILL START TO SEE, I AM SURE, DIFFERENT STATES COMING UP WITH DIFFERENT STANDARDS OF WHICH, AS REBECCA INDICATED, COULD HAVE REALLY DEVASTATING EFFECTS ON AN INDUSTRY THAT GENERATED $525 MILLION IN NEW MEXICO'S ECONOMY DURING 2019.
Gene: EVEN MORE, BY THE WAY.
IT BUMPED UP TO 630 MILLION LAST YEAR.
Tom: IT IS A HUGE INDUSTRY AND IT IS A TREMENDOUS TRAGEDY.
UNFORTUNATELY BECAUSE OF WHERE IT HAPPENED, NEW MEXICO AND HOW NEW MEXICO HANDLES THIS IS NOW UNDER THE SPOTLIGHT.
SO, I THINK THAT THE GOVERNOR DID A GOOD JOB OF DEFLECTING IT, SAYING, HEY, WE ARE GOING TO LOOK TO THE INDUSTRY FIRST SO THAT WAY THE STATE DOESN'T TAKE THE HIT.
THIS COULD HAVE HAPPENED ANYWHERE.
Gene: TOM, I AM GOING TO STAY WITH YOU ON THIS.
YOU MENTIONED THE PRESS DEAL THAT IS UP THERE.
IT IS UNBELIEVABLE THE AMOUNT OF CAMERAS AT THE SANTA FE SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT AND FOR THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY UP THERE TO HEAR THEM SPEAK.
HOW ARE WE DOING ON THAT FRONT?
ARE WE PRESENTING OURSELVES WELL IN NEW MEXICO ON THIS INTERNATIONAL MOMENT THAT IS VERY STRESSFUL AND VERY DIFFICULT?
Tom: IT IS VERY DIFFICULT TO SAY WHAT THAT DEFINITION OF WELL IS.
BECAUSE, YOU KNOW, THE SUBJECT MATTER, YOU KNOW, THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE, DA, EVERYBODY IS GOING THROUGH AN INVESTIGATIVE PROCESS AND SO WHAT I LIKE ABOUT WHAT I AM SEEING IS THEY ARE HAVING REGULAR UPDATES TO THE MEDIA, YOU KNOW, THEY ARE NOT CUTTING ANY SIDE DEALS.
YOU ARE NOT SEEING ANY INVESTIGATORS OR ANYBODY FROM THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE KIND OF LEAKING INFORMATION OUT.
THE STATE HAS BEEN VERY QUIET.
ANYTHING THAT HAS POSSIBLY BEEN LEAKING OUT HAS BEEN LEAKING OUT FROM THE CAST AND CREW OF THE SHOW RUST.
SO, NEW MEXICO AS A WHOLE I WOULD HAVE TO SAY IS DOING AS WELL AS IT CAN RIGHT NOW WITH THE MEDIA RESPONSE JUST BY FOLLOWING -- BLOCKING AND TACKLING, TAKING CARE OF THINGS, HAVING REGULAR BRIEFS, ANSWERING QUESTIONS DIRECTLY, LETTING THEM KNOW WHAT THAT PROCESS IS.
Gene: HEY, ERIC, WE HAVE HEARD FROM A LOT OF PEOPLE INCLUDING RECENTLY IN A FACEBOOK LIVE I DID WITH LOCAL UNION MEMBERS THAT PRODUCTIONS BRING IN CREW FROM ALL OVER AND CALL THEM LOCAL.
ARE YOU WORRIED ABOUT THE SITUATION PUTTING A DARK SHADOW OVER THE LOCAL FILM WORKFORCE, YOU KNOW.
AS REBECCA MENTIONED, THE ARMORER IS FROM OUT OF STATE.
I DON'T KNOW IF THE AD IS FROM OUT OF STATE BUT EVERYONE IS ASSUMING EVERYONE INVOLVED IS FROM NEW MEXICO.
YOU SEE WHERE I AM GOING?
IT IS A DIFFICULTY.
WHAT DO YOU THINK?
Eric: WELL, I HAVEN'T HEARD THAT NEW MEXICO CREWS ARE A BUNCH OF YAHOOS BUT I WANT TO GET BACK TO BOTH WHAT REBECCA AND TOM SAID.
LOOK, WE BUILT THIS INDUSTRY FROM SCRATCH WITH PUBLIC DOLLARS.
LET'S BE CLEAR ABOUT THAT.
THERE IS HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN INVESTMENT IN THIS INDUSTRY THAT WE BUILT FROM SCRATCH.
SO, I THINK IT IS ABSOLUTELY CRITICAL THAT IN ADDITION TO SUPPORTING INDUSTRY TO MAKING SURE IT IS SAFE, WORKPLACES ARE SAFE, IT IS INCUMBENT ON US TO SAY, LOOK, WE ARE GOING TO CONTINUE TO MAKE NEW MEXICO A HOSPITABLE PLACE FOR FILM AND WE ARE GOING EXPECT THESE FOLKS GETTING THESE MASSIVE SUBSIDIES ARE ADHERING TO THE HIGHEST STANDARD FOR THEIR WORKFORCE.
I ACTUALLY THINK IT IS A MISSED OPPORTUNITY FOR OUR POLITICAL LEADERS TO SAY, WELL, LET'S NOT DO ANYTHING TO SCARE THEM OFF, BECAUSE, YOU KNOW, OF THE 2 OR 300 MILLION WE INVESTED SO FAR IS NOT WORTH IT.
SO, I THINK THIS IS A MOMENT FOR NOT JUST NEW MEXICO CREWS BECAUSE WE HAVE ALSO WORKED HARD TO BUILD NEW MEXICO CREWS.
WE DIDN'T HAVE ENOUGH CREWS BEFORE.
WE INVESTED A TON OF MONEY AT CNM AND OTHER PLACES TO BUILD THAT SO WE HAVE A REPUTATION NOW FOR HAVING SOME PRETTY SOLID CREWS.
I DON'T THINK THAT IS GOING TO SPILL OVER ON TO THE INDIVIDUAL NEW MEXICANS.
I THINK IT IS REALLY GOING TO BE, HONESTLY, ABOUT THE PRODUCTION.
ARE YOU GOING TO DO A BETTER JOB OF MAKING SURE THESE PRODUCTIONS ARE SAFE, INCLUDING FOLKS LIKE ALEC BALDWIN WHO IS THE PRODUCER OF THIS SHOW.
I THINK EVEN THOUGH HE DOESN'T HAVE PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY, THAT IT IS NOT HIS FAULT WHAT HAPPENED WITH THE GUN, BUT HE IS IN CHARGE THE ALL OVERALL PRODUCTION AND THE FOLKS IN CHARGE NEED TO DO A BETTER JOB OF HOLDING EVERYBODY ACCOUNTABLE, INCLUDING WHO THEY HIRE, INCLUDING HOW WEAPONS ARE HANDLED ON THE SET, INCLUDING HOW THEY VET PEOPLE.
THERE IS A LOT OF THINGS THAT WENT WRONG IN THIS PARTICULAR CASE.
Gene: GOOD POINTS THERE.
REBECCA, DO YOU THINK THIS INVESTIGATION, ESPECIALLY, WILL IMPACT THE RATIFICATION FOR THAT NEW AGREEMENT I MENTIONED EARLIER WITH THE BELOW THE LINE FILMMAKERS.
MIGHT THIS SITUATION PUT THAT IN JEOPARDY?
Rebecca: I AM NOT VERY FAMILIAR WITH THE NEGOTIATIONS AND HOW THOSE WORKERS -- I AM NOT FAMILIAR WITH THE SITUATION BUT I WOULD SAY THIS CERTAINLY JUST MAKES THEIR POINT.
IF THEY ARE CONCERNED OR, YOU KNOW, WE HAVE HEARD ABOUT ON THIS PARTICULAR SET ABOUT THE CONCERN OVER SAFETY AND THE CORNERS BEING CUT AND HOW THESE WORKERS WALKED OFF THE SET BECAUSE THEY NEEDED TO MAKE THEIR POINT VERY CLEAR TO BE SAFE.
WE ALL KNOW, YOU KNOW, YOU CAN, THERE IS THAT TRIANGLE, IT CAN BE FAST AND CHEAP BUT IT WON'T BE GOOD.
IT CAN BE GOOD AND FAST BUT IT WON'T BE CHEAP.
THEY WERE TRYING TO MAKE SOMETHING FAST AND CHEAP AND THEN THE CENTERS AREN'T GOOD.
SO I THINK THIS REALLY KIND OF PLAYS TO THAT POINT.
WE ALL HAVE TO DO A BETTER JOB OF PROTECTING THIS PUBLIC INDUSTRY, THIS PUBLIC INVESTMENT.
WE HAVE GOT TO PROTECT IT AND THEN REALLY JUST HEAR THOSE CONCERNS AND THEN DO WHATEVER WE CAN TO HELP FIND A GOOD COMPROMISE.
Gene: WE'LL HAVE MORE ON THE FALLOUT FROM THE TRAGEDY ON THE RUST SET ON OUR FACEBOOK PAGE INCLUDING A DISCUSSION ON LIABILITIES AND ACCOUNTABILITY WITH UNM PROFESSOR SHERRI BURR.
WE ENCOURAGE YOU TO GIVE THAT A WATCH IF YOU HAVEN'T ALREADY.
NOW TO OUR SECOND SPEAKER TONIGHT ON THE ALBUQUERQUE STADIUM BOND MEASURE.
THE ISSUE HAS BROUGHT ABOUT SOME STRONG OPINIONS AND FOR PEOPLE LIVING IN NEIGHBORHOODS WHERE THE STADIUM COULD BECOME BUILT, IT IS PERSONAL.
A GROUP OF THOSE CONCERNED CITIZENS CAME TOGETHER TO FORM STOP THE STADIUM CAMPAIGN.
THEIR INTENTIONS ARE SELF EXPLANATORY CENTERED AROUND THE FEAR A NEW STADIUM COULD TURN THEIR HOME INTO A PLACE THEY NO LONGER RECOGNIZE.
Malczynski: HI, I AM RAMONA MALCZYNSKI.
I GREW UP IN ALBUQUERQUE AND I AM A GRADUATE STUDENT AND TEACHER ASSISTANT AT THE UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO.
ON SATURDAY I VOTED AGAINST THE STADIUM BONDS AND I URGE ALL ALBUQUERQUE VOTERS TO DO THE SAME.
MILLIONAIRE TEAM OWNERS AND DEVELOPERS WOULD PROFIT FROM THE PROPOSED STADIUM AND THE PUBLIC WOULD GET DECADES OF DEBT.
MAJORITY OF PEOPLE IN ALBUQUERQUE THINK WE HAVE OTHER PRIORITIES.
ON ONE SIDE ARE MILLIONAIRES SPENDING HUGE SUMS OF MONEY TO TRICK THE PUBLIC WITH ADVERTISING.
ON THE OTHER SIDE ARE VOLUNTEERS, WORKING CLASS RESIDENTS LIKE ME FIGHTING GENTRIFICATION.
THIS IS DAVID VERSUS GOLIATH.
SO FAR, TEAM OWNERS HAVE SPENT NEARLY ONE MILLION DOLLARS ON ADS TO TRICK US.
THEY SPENT 330,000 IN JUST 10 DAYS IN OCTOBER.
SELLING THE STADIUM AS A TOOL FOR ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL REVITALIZATION, HOWEVER, VIRTUALLY ALL STUDIES OF THE IMPACTS OF PUBLIC FUNDED STADIUMS SHOW THAT STADIUMS HAVE LITTLE TO NO POSITIVE IMPACT ON LOCAL ECONOMIES.
ON THE OTHER HAND, STADIUMS DRASTICALLY INCREASE RENT AND PROPERTY TAXES, NOT JUST IN THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOODS BUT IN THE ENTIRE CITY.
SPORTS STADIUMS LIKE THESE ARE A TOOL FOR GENTRIFICATION, PUSHING OUT LONG-TERM, WORKING CLASS RESIDENTS SO REAL ESTATE DEVELOPERS AND TEAM OWNERS CAN PROFIT.
WE DO NOT WANT THAT TO HAPPEN IN ALBUQUERQUE'S HISTORIC NEIGHBORHOOD.
WE KNOW THAT THE WAY TO IMPROVE OUR CITY IS THROUGH MORE FUNDING FOR EDUCATION, AFFORDABLE HOUSING AND OTHER SOCIAL SERVICES THAT WOULD ADDRESS HOMELESSNESS, CHILD WELFARE, HUNGER AND CRIMES OF POVERTY AT THEIR ROOTS.
NO MONEY SHOULD BE SPENT ON A SPORTS STADIUM WHEN ANY ALBUQUERQUE RESIDENT FACES POVERTY, HUNGER AND HOMELESSNESS.
WE NEED THOSE 50 MILLION-DOLLARS SPENT ON HELPING OUR NEIGHBORS NOW, NOT TIED UP IN BUILDING A STADIUM.
PLUS, WE DO NOT WANT TO SEE ANYONE PUSHED OUT OF THEIR HOMES.
WHICH IS EXACTLY WHAT WILL HAPPEN BECAUSE THERE IS A STATE-WIDE PROHIBITION ON LOCAL RENT CONTROL AND THOUSANDS ARE FACING EVICTIONS DUE TO THE ECONOMIC CRISIS CAUSED BY THE PANDEMIC.
DESPITE THE LIES OF THOSE BEHIND THE STADIUM PROPOSAL EVEN A COMMUNITY BENEFITS AGREEMENT DOES NOT PROTECT ALBUQUERQUE RESIDENTS FROM GENTRIFICATION.
THE CITIES CBA LAWYER JULIAN GROSS STATED IN A VIRTUAL TOWN HALL THAT CBA'S DO NOT STOP GENTRIFICATION AND DISPLACEMENT.
IN ADDITION OUR TAX DOLLARS WOULD BE USED TO PAY THIS 50 MILLION LOAN BUT WHILE THE CITY WOULD OWN THE STADIUM, THE BINDING LETTERS INTENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND NEW MEXICO UNITED STATES THAT THE TEAM WOULD OWN AND CONTROL ALL REVENUES FROM THE STADIUM AND PAY A FRACTION OF THAT IN RENT.
FINALLY, THE MAJORITY OF RESIDENTS IN ALBUQUERQUE'S HISTORIC NEIGHBORHOODS DO NOT WANT THE STADIUM.
THEY DO NOT WANT INCREASED HOUSING COST, TRAFFIC AND OUTSIDE DEVELOPMENT THAT WILL TRANSFORM NEIGHBORHOODS FOREVER.
NO MATTER WHERE THE STADIUM WOULD BE BUILT, THOUGH, WE KNOW THAT IT IS AN ATTEMPT TO BEGIN TO CHANGE ALBUQUERQUE INTO A CITY FOR THE WEALTHY AND ELITE.
THIS STADIUM WILL NOT BENEFIT WORKING PEOPLE AND IS A STEP IN THE DIRECTION OF LOSING COMMUNITIES THAT DEFINE THE CITY WE LOVE.
ALBUQUERQUE VOTE AGAINST THE STADIUM BONDS.
Rebecca: WE ARE ON TRACK TO LOSE 200 OFFICERS THIS YEAR.
SO OUR ATTRITION RATE IS HIGHER THAN OUR GRADUATION RATE GETTING FOLKS INTO THE ACADEMY.
IT IS NOT A MONEY ISSUE.
THEY ARE NOT RETIRING BECAUSE OF MONEY SO BY OFFERING THEM MORE MONEY TO COME BACK, THAT IS NOT GOING TO CHANGE ANYTHING.
Laura: I AM LAURA PASKUS.
NEW MEXICANS ARE FACING SOME POTENTIALLY BIG CHANGES WHEN IT COMES TO OUR ELECTRICAL UTILITY.
THAT IS BECAUSE THERE IS A MERGER BEING WORKED OUT BETWEEN PNM RESOURCES AND AVINGRID, THE U.S. SUBSIDIARY OF A SPANISH POWER COMPANY.
HOW THAT WILL PLAY OUT AND WHAT THE CONSEQUENCES MIGHT BE REMAIN TO BE SEEN.
BUT I CHECKED IN RECENTLY WITH CAITLIN ANDREWS A REPORTER FOR THE BANGOR DAILY NEWS.
AVINGRID HAS BEEN IN MAINE FOR MORE THAN A DECADE AND THE COMPANY HAS NOT BEEN WITHOUT CONTROVERSY.
HERE IN NEW MEXICO THERE IS A PLANNED MULTI BILLION DOLLAR MERGER BETWEEN PNM RESOURCES AND AVINGRID.
PNM HAS OPERATED AS A MONOPOLY THE STATE'S ELECTRICAL UTILITIES FOR DECADES AND AVINGRID IS A U.S. BASED SUBSIDIARY OF A SPANISH POWER COMPANY.
THIS IS ALL STILL PLAYING OUT HERE IN NEW MEXICO.
IN MAINE IN 2008 AVINGRID BOUGHT CENTRAL MAINE POWER.
WHEN THE COMPANY WAS COMING TO MAINE WHAT ARE SOME OF THE THINGS THAT THEY PROMISED AND WHAT HAVE PEOPLE SEEN HAPPEN OVER THE PAST 14 YEARS?
Andrews: I SHOULD SAY TO START THE WAY IT ACTUALLY CAME ABOUT, WAS IBERDROLA BOUGHT ENERGY EAST WHICH CENTRAL MAINE POWER WHICH WAS A SUBSIDIARY 2008 AND THEN IN 2015 IBERDROLA BOUGHT THIS OTHER COMPANY CALLED UIL HOLDINGS.
THEY MERGED THEM TOGETHER AND CREATED AVINGRID.
SO, AVINGRID WAS BIRTHED IN 2015 AND CMP ENDED UP BEING SOMETHING UNDERNEATH THAT.
I BELIEVE THE IDEA OF MERGING THEM TOGETHER WOULD CREATE MORE RELIABILITY, CREATE MORE DEPENDABLE CUSTOMER SERVICES AND IT WOULD CREATE A STRONGER UTILITY ALTOGETHER.
SOME OF THE CHALLENGES THAT HAVE COME UP SINCE THEN, YOU KNOW, YOU CAN MAKE THE ARGUMENT, WELL, AT LEAST THE STATE FOUND VERY RECENTLY COULD HAVE STRONG FROM THE AVINGRID MERGER.
THEY RELEASED A AUDIT THAT HAS BEEN THREE YEARS IN THE MAKING WITH LIBERTY CONSULTING GROUP THIS YEAR THAT FOUND AVINGRID ITSELF IS NOT A BAD COMPANY BUT IT HAS STRUGGLED SINCE THE MERGER TO BE ABLE TO PROVIDE CUSTOMER SERVICE, LARGELY BECAUSE IT HAS BEEN CUTTING OR LIMITING SOME OF ITS RESOURCES TO MEETS ITS EARNINGS EXPECTATIONS.
THE CHALLENGES IT CREATED THAT HAPPENED FROM THAT WAS THAT IT CREATED STAFFING FLUCTUATIONS, WITH STAFF SOMETIMES BEING CUT AND SOMETIMES RESTORED, WHICH CREATED AN UNEVEN EXPECTATION OF CUSTOMER SERVICE RELIABILITY.
THAT INVESTIGATION REALLY SPRANG OUT OF A SCANDAL THAT CAME OUT IN OCTOBER OF 2017 WHEN THERE WAS A LOCAL STORM WHERE SOME PEOPLE LOST POWER FOR AT LEAST A WEEK AND RECEIVED HIGH BILLS AFTERWARDS.
WHICH, LATER LED TO THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION IN MAINE FINDING THAT CMP NEEDED TO ACCOMMODATE ITS CUSTOMERS FOR BILLING THEM WHEN THEY EXPERIENCE HIGH OUTAGES.
Laura: RECENTLY REPRESENTATIVE SETH BERRY, A MAINE LAWMAKER, HE WROTE AN OP ED THAT WAS CIRCULATED PRETTY WIDELY HERE IN NEW MEXICO WARNING THE STATE AGAINST THE MERGER.
IS THE COMPANY THIS UNPOPULAR IN MAINE?
Andrews: CERTAINLY, I THINK ANY CONVERSATION ABOUT AVINGRID IS REALLY A REFLECTION OF CMP.
THAT IS A LOCAL UTILITY, ONE MORE PEOPLE ARE FAMILIAR WITH.
YOU SEE AVINGRID COMING UP IN THE CONVERSATION AROUND THE NEW ENGLAND CLEAN ENERGY CONNECT WHICH IS A HYDROPOWER CORRIDOR THAT IS GOING TO BRING HYDROPOWER ELECTRICITY DOWN THROUGH MAINE INTO MASSACHUSETTS AND ALSO INTO THE REGIONAL GRID BUT IT IS HAPPENING TO FULFILL A BIG MASSACHUSETTS ATTEMPT TO FILL ITS RENEWABLE ENERGY GOALS.
SO, WHEN PEOPLE ARE TALKING ABOUT AVINGRID, THEY ARE USUALLY TALKING ABOUT IT THROUGH THE PERSPECTIVE OF THE CORRIDOR ABOUT HOW THIS COMPANY DOESN'T CARE ABOUT THE MAINE CUSTOMERS BECAUSE THEY ARE SUCH A SMALL PERCENTAGE OF EARNINGS OVERALL.
THERE IS NO GUARANTEE THEY ARE GOING TO HAVE YOUR BEST INTERESTS IN MIND WHEN IT COMES TO THIS.
Laura: SO, ONE OF THE THINGS THAT REPRESENTATIVE BERRY WROTE ABOUT IN HIS SORT OF WARNING TO NEW MEXICANS, HE MENTIONED THAT THERE IS A BILL THAT THE MAINE LEGISLATURE PASSED TO REVOKE AVINGRID'S MONOPOLY AND REPLACE CENTRAL MAINE CENTRAL POWER WITH A NONPROFIT CONSUMER-OWNED UTILITY.
HE ALSO WROTE THAT THE BILL IS SUPPORTED BY 75% OF MAINERS AND THAT IF IT BECAME LAW, IT WOULD SAVE RATE PAYORS NINE BILLION DOLLARS IN THE FIRST 30 YEARS AND ACCELERATE THIS STATE'S TRANSITION TO RENEWABLE ENERGY.
BASED ON YOUR REPORTING, IS THIS ACCURATE INFORMATION?
IS THIS AN ACCURATE ASSESSMENT?
Andrews: WELL, I CAN'T QUITE SPEAK TO HOW, I GUESS, WIDESPREAD FAVORABILITY IS FOR THE CONCEPT OF CONSUMER-OWNED UTILITIES.
I ACTUALLY WOULD SAY THAT I DON'T KNOW THAT A LOT OF PEOPLE WOULD KNOW WHAT IT WOULD DO BUT I DO KNOW THAT THERE WAS A STUDY THAT CAME OUT THAT IF A CONSUMER-OWNED UTILITY HAPPENED WHICH IN MAINE THE CONCEPT HERE IS THAT IT WOULD CREATE A NONPROFIT THAT WOULD THEN GO TO BOND IN ORDER TO BUY OUT CMP AND VERSANT POWER WHICH ARE THE TWO BIGGEST UTILITY COMPANIES IN THE STATE.
THERE IS A LOT OF QUESTIONS ABOUT WHETHER THEY WOULD BE ABLE TO SELL.
THERE IS ACTUALLY A COMPETING REFERENDUM TRYING TO STOP THAT, BUT THERE WAS A STUDY THAT CAME OUT THAT INITIALLY RATES WOULD INCREASE FOR THE FIRST FEW YEARS BUT THEN EVENTUALLY THE CUSTOMERS WOULD SEE POSSIBLE RATE DECREASES OVER TIME.
Laura: HERE IN NEW MEXICO, PNM RESOURCES IS LIKE A POLITICAL POWERHOUSE.
YOU KNOW, THEY HAVE A GREAT DEAL OF INFLUENCE IN THE LEGISLATURE AND OVER STATE GOVERNMENT.
I AM CURIOUS IN TERMS OF POLITICAL INFLUENCE KIND OF WHAT THE SITUATION IS WITH CMP AND AVINGRID IN MAINE?
Andrews: WELL, CERTAINLY, CMP AND AVINGRID HAVE NOT BEEN SHY ABOUT FLEXING SOME POLITICAL MONEY AROUND THIS REFERENDUM.
THE REFERENDUM SPENDING ALTOGETHER IS BETWEEN THIS ONE AND FIRST ONE THAT WAS STRUCK DOWN FOR CONSTITUTIONAL PURPOSES IS OVER 62 MILLION AND WITHIN THIS QUARTER ALONE, AVINGRID SPENT 8.7 MILLION TO CLEAN ENERGY MATTERS.
THERE HAS BEEN A LOT OF SPENDING ON LIKE ADS AND MAILERS AND YOU CAN MAKE ARGUMENT ABOUT HOW USEFUL THOSE CAN BE IN A POLITICAL SEASON BUT IT IS CERTAINLY WAYS THAT PEOPLE LIKE TO FLEX THEIR POLITICAL FORCES.
THEY HAVE VERY POWERFUL INFLUENCE IN AUGUSTA.
THEY HAVE SOME OF THE MOST HIGH PAID LOBBYING FIRMS THAT WORK TO DEFEAT THE CONSUMER-OWNED UTILITY BILL.
I CANNOT SPEAK SPECIFICALLY TO SOME OF THE OTHER BILLS BUT THAT ONE THEY WERE DEFINITELY HAVING SOME PRESENCE ON.
Laura: I AM CURIOUS, WHAT QUESTIONS DO YOU THINK THAT PEOPLE SHOULD BE ASKING AVINGRID RIGHT NOW TO HOLD THE COMPANY ACCOUNTABLE IF THE MERGER GOES THROUGH AND INTO THE FUTURE?
Andrews: ONE OF THE THINGS THAT REALLY STOOD OUT TO ME IS THAT AUDIT LIBERTY CONSULTING GROUP WHEN THEY REALLY EXPLAINED HOW BIG AVINGRID IS, YOU KNOW.
IT SAID THAT ITS FORCE, WHICH MEANS WORKFORCE, HAS RECEIVED 35,000 COMPARED TO CMT WHICH HAS JUST OVER 900 PEOPLE.
MADE A NOTE THAT SAYING THAT MAINE COMPRISES ABOUT 20% OF U.S. UTILITIES OPERATIONS BUT JUST 2% OF OVERALL UTILITY CUSTOMERS.
IF I AM IN NEW MEXICO, I WOULD ASK AVINGRID, HOW ARE YOU GOING TO GUARANTEE THAT YOU UNDERSTAND OUR SPECIFIC ENERGY NEEDS, YOU KNOW, WHAT OUR UTILITY NEEDS ARE.
WHO ARE YOU GOING TO WORK WITH, YOU KNOW, IF THERE IS AN UNSATISFACTORY CUSTOMER SERVICE, WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO TRY TO DO TO MAKE THAT BETTER, HOW WELL IS YOUR UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT NEW MEXICO CUSTOMERS NEED?
Laura: WELL, CAITLIN ANDERSON, I REALLY APPRECIATED READING YOUR COVERAGE OF UTILITY IN MAINE AND I REALLY APPRECIATE YOU COMING ON NEW MEXICO FOCUS TODAY.
THANKS.
Andrews: THANK YOU SO MUCH.
Greene: WITH SO MANY DIFFERING PERSPECTIVES ON THE STADIUM BONDS ISSUE, SOME CITY COUNCILORS HAVE HAD TO SHIFT THEIR POSITIONS AFTER HEARING FROM THE PEOPLE THEY REPRESENT.
ALBUQUERQUE CITY COUNCILOR BROOK BASSAN JOINS US NOW TO EXPLAIN THE DECISION VOTERS WILL MAKE AND HOW HER STANCE HAS CHANGED AFTER HER CONSTITUENTS MADE THEIR OPINIONS KNOWN.
Bassan: MY NAME IS BROOK BASSAN AND I AM AN ALBUQUERQUE CITY COUNCILOR FOR DISTRICT 4 NEAR THE NORTHEAST HEIGHTS.
I AGREED TO CO-SPONSOR THE LEGISLATION THAT ALLOWED VOTERS TO DECIDE IF THEY WOULD LIKE TO SEE THE CITY USE 50 MILLION DOLLARS OF GROSS RECEIPTS TAX REVENUE BONDS TO HELP BUILD A SOCCER STADIUM IN ALBUQUERQUE.
THE STADIUM WOULD BE HOME TO NEW MEXICO UNITED AND POTENTIAL HOME FOR OTHER TEAMS DOWN THE LINE.
IT IS SAID IT WOULD REVITALIZE ALBUQUERQUE AND OFFER A PLACE FOR FAMILIES AND RESIDENTS TO GATHER IN SUPPORT OF A TEAM WHOSE GOAL IS GREATER THAN JUST A GAME.
UNITED REPRESENTS IDEALS OF SUPPORT, KINDNESS, SPORTSMANSHIP OF ALL LEVELS AND A TRUE UNITY OF ALL PEOPLE.
SURPRISINGLY CONSTITUENTS WERE VERY VOCAL OF THEIR LACK OF SUPPORT ABOUT PLACING THIS QUESTION ON THE BALLOT.
A MASSIVE MAJORITY OF PHONE CALLS AND EMAILS EXPRESSED CLEAR UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT WAS BEING PROPOSED.
NOT ONLY DID PEOPLE INDICATE THEY WERE OPPOSED TO BUILDING A MOSTLY PUBLICALLY FINANCED STADIUM BUT PRECISE IN COMMUNICATING THEY DIDN'T EVEN WANT IT TO BE A VOTE FOR THEM TO CHOOSE.
I THOUGHT SOMETHING THE SIZE OF A 50 MILLION DOLLAR PROJECT WOULD BE BEST VOTED ON BY THE PUBLIC.
MOST OF MY CONSTITUENTS TOLD ME THEY ELECTED ME TO MAKE THIS DECISION FOR THEM.
FOR THAT REASON, I ENDED UP VOTING AGAINST PLACING THE QUESTION ON THE BALLOT.
IT ENDED UP PASSING THE CITY COUNCIL ON 7-2 VOTE.
THERE ARE PROS AND CONS TO BUILDING A NEW SOCCER STADIUM.
ON ONE HAND IT WOULD REVITALIZE PART OF THE CITY, OFFER JOBS, ECONOMIC BUSINESS SUPPORT AND ECONOMIC STIMULATION AND SOMEWHERE FOR YOUTH AND FAMILIES TO ENGAGE IN A POSITIVE ACTIVITY TOGETHER.
IT WOULD BE FUN, ENERGIC AND INVIGORATING AND IT WILL NOT RAISE TAXES.
ON THE OTHER HAND, IT MIGHT GENTRIFY NEIGHBORHOODS.
THE JOB MAY ONLY BE TEMPORARY OR SEASONAL AND ATTENDANCE MIGHT NOT FILL THE REQUESTED AMOUNT OF SEATING AS GAMES AT THEIR CURRENT LOCATION ARE RARELY FULL.
THIS MAY LEAD TO LESS REVENUE THAN PLANNED, DESIRED OR NECESSARY FOR SUSTAINABILITY.
MOST IMPORTANTLY, THERE ARE MANY OTHER PROJECTS THROUGHOUT ALL OF ALBUQUERQUE THAT ARE CURRENTLY PLANNED OR BEING BUILT IN PHASES DUE TO A LACK OF FUNDING.
REFINANCING OF THESE BONDS COULD BE USED INSTEAD TO FINISH MANY OF THESE IN THE PIPELINE.
ALSO, THE OVERWHELMING PRIORITY OF OUR CITY IS CLEARLY A CONCERN ABOUT THE REDUCTION OF CRIME AND WHAT TO DO TO HELP THE UNHOUSED.
HOW MIGHT A NEW STADIUM ASSIST WITH THIS?
SO, NOW IT IS IN THE HANDS OF VOTERS TO DECIDE WHAT IS IN THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE OVERALL COMMUNITY.
EARLY VOTING IS CURRENTLY UNDERWAY AND ELECTION DAY IS NOVEMBER 2.
VOTER REGISTRATION CAN OCCUR AT MOST, IF NOT ALL, VOTING SITES.
AMONG MANY OTHER IMPORTANT QUESTIONS ON THE BALLOT, EVERYONE AGE 18 AND ABOVE IN ALBUQUERQUE SHOULD GO VOTE TO DECIDE IF BUILDING A NEW SOCCER STADIUM IS A PRIORITY FOR THEM.
Gene: COULD NEW MEXICO RETURN TO THE WORLD OF DOUBLE DIPPING TO COMBAT THE ONGOING CRIME CRISIS?
RETIRED OFFICER AND CURRENT STATE REPRESENTATIVE BILL REHM HOPES SO.
HE SAYS HE IS WORKING ON LEGISLATION THAT WOULD ALLOW RETIRED LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS TO RETURN TO THE WORKFORCE WHILE STILL COLLECTING PENSION BENEFITS AS WELL.
HENCE THE TERM DOUBLE DIPPING.
ERIC, THERE WOULD BE CONDITIONS UNDER MR. REHM'S PROPOSAL INCLUDING A SIX-MONTH WAITING PERIOD BEFORE THE OFFICERS CAN RETURN TO THE WORKFORCE.
AND INCENTIVES TO HOLD OFF ON COLLECTING PENSION WHILE RETURNING TO WORK.
WE KNOW THAT CRIME IS A CONCERN STATE-WIDE, BUT IS THIS THE SOLUTION IN YOUR MIND, UNDERSTANDING I KNOW YOU ARE UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT HAPPENED LAST TIME AROUND WHEN WE GOT RID OF DOUBLE DIPPING.
WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE HERE?
Eric: BAD IDEA.
LET ME TELL YOU THE THREE THINGS THAT WE COULD DO.
THE CITY IS ALREADY DOING.
APD IS OFFERING $10,000 SIGN-ON BONUSES FOR NEW OFFICERS.
YOU WANT TO GET SOME NEW FOLKS WHO AREN'T STEEPED IN THE DYSFUNCTIONAL CULTURE OF APD AND A LOT OF DEPARTMENTS, YOU KNOW, GIVE THEM A REASON TO JOIN UP.
I THINK IT IS LIKE TEACHERS, PART OF THE REAL DIFFERENCE IF THEY HAVE A FAMILY, RIGHT?
THE SECOND THING IS BOTH SANTA FE AND ALBUQUERQUE ARE DOING COMMUNITY SAFETY DEPARTMENTS.
ALBUQUERQUE IS REALLY GETTING OFF THE GROUND, TO REALLY TAKE SOME OF THE DEMAND FOR POLICE TIME, FOR PERSON HOURS OF POLICE, ON THESE MENTAL HEALTH AND ADDICTION AND SORT OF LIKE THESE KIND OF CALLS THAT REALLY COULD BE TAKEN BY SOMEONE OTHER THAN A UNIFORMED OFFICERS.
THAT IS THE SECOND THING WE SHOULD DOUBLE DOWN ON FOR THE CITY AND THEN THE THIRD THING WHICH I THINK IS REALLY IMPORTANT, WE HAVEN'T TALK ABOUT A LOT ABOUT THERE ARE FOLKS WHO HAVE THIS GREAT IDEA OF STARTING TO, WHETHER IT IS A CHARTER SCHOOL OR SOME KIND OF TRAINING SCHOOL, TO CHANGE THE CULTURE AND START GETTING YOUNGER KIDS INTERESTED IN BECOMING, ENTERING PUBLIC SAFETY FROM A MUCH MORE HOLISTIC PERSPECTIVE, RIGHT?
NOT JUST THE KIDS WHO ALWAYS WANTED TO BE A POLICE OFFICER AND HAVE A GUN BUT THE FOLKS WHO ARE THINKING, DO I DO TEACHING, DO I DO MILITARY.
LIKE GIVE THEM A REASON AND PLACE WHERE THEY CAN LEARN COMMUNITY SKILLS, SOCIAL WORK BUT ALSO LAW ENFORCEMENT AND ALSO ETHICS AND ALL THESE OTHER THINGS THAT YOU COULD LEARN SO YOU CREATE A PIPELINE.
IF YOU DO THOSE THREE THINGS, BONUSES, SIGN-ON BONUSES, EXPANDING DEPARTMENTS TO TAKE SOME OF THE WORKLOAD OFF THE OFFICERS AND THEN IF WE START TO CREATE A PIPELINE, I THINK THAT IS I THE MUCH BETTER SOLUTION THAN ASKING OLD TIMERS TO COME BACK AND, HEY, WE'LL MAKE IT WORTH YOUR WHILE, YOU CAN COLLECT THIS PENSION AND THEN YOU'RE BOUNCING A LOT OF YOUNG PEOPLE.
IT IS DEMORALIZING FOR THE DEPARTMENT AND I DON'T THINK IT CHANGES THE CULTURE OF THESE DEPARTMENTS.
THE PROBLEM IS, AND I SAY THIS AS AN OLD GUY, THESE OLD TIMERS, YOU KNOW, WE ARE KIND OF SET IN OUR WAYS IF WE WERE SOCIALIZED IN ONE OF THOSE OLD DEPARTMENTS WHERE IT WAS PERHAPS NOT THE MOST PROGRESSIVE WAY TO DO LAW ENFORCEMENT.
THAT IS WHAT WE ARE GOING TO GET IF WE BRING THESE OLD TIMERS BACK.
Gene: I APPRECIATE THAT SO MUCH.
IT WAS MY VERY FIRST THOUGHT.
I MEAN, THE OLDER GUYS COMING BACK IN, TELLING THESE YOUNGER GUYS HOW AND WHAT SHOULD BE DONE, ALL THAT KIND OF THING, IT IS JUST HOW PEOPLE ARE.
REBECCA, JUST A QUICK QUESTION ON THIS AND ANOTHER THING GOING BACK TO DOUBLE DIPPING.
IS THIS A WHITE FLAG?
LIKE ERIC SAID, THERE IS A LOT OF THINGS WE CAN DO.
WHY DO WE HAVE TO TAKE THIS GIANT LEAP BACK TO PEOPLE WHO ARE LIVING A DIFFERENT LIFE, BASICALLY, AT THIS POINT?
Rebecca: WELL, IF YOU WOULD HAVE ASKED ME HOW I FELT ABOUT DOUBLE DIPPING PROBABLY A MONTH AGO I WOULD HAVE SAID WE ARE AT THE POINT WHERE, LIKE, ANY MEANS NECESSARY, BY ALL MEANS NECESSARY, LET'S GET MORE COPS.
I AM A HUGE FAN OF OUR POLICE.
I AM SAD TO READ IN THE JOURNAL THAT MOST OF US ARE FANS AND WE DO FEEL LIKE THEY ARE DOING A GOOD JOB.
WHETHER WE FELL SAFE OR NOT SAFE, NO MATTER WHO IT IS WE ARE VOTING FOR, PEOPLE SEEM TO BE GENERALLY ALIGNED THAT OUR POLICE ARE DOING A GOOD JOB.
THE THING IS THAT THEY ARE NOT -- I THINK WE WILL COME CLOSE TO 200 OFFICERS WHO LEAVE THE FORCE THIS YEAR FROM APD AND I DO WANT TO REITERATE, THIS IS AN ALBUQUERQUE ISSUE.
NEW MEXICO IS NOT UNDERSTAFFED IN POLICING.
NO OTHER FORCE.
THIS IS AN ALBUQUERQUE ISSUE.
BUT, WE ARE ON TRACK TO LOSE CLOSE TO 200 OFFICERS THIS YEAR, SO, OUR ATTRITION RATE IS HIGHER THAN OUR GRADUATION RATE GETTING FOLKS INTO THE ACADEMY.
IT IS NOT A MONEY ISSUE.
THEY ARE NOT RETIRING BECAUSE OF MONEY.
SO BY OFFERING THEM MORE MONEY TO COME BACK, THAT IS NOT GOING TO CHANGE ANYTHING.
IF WE PASS THIS LEGISLATION, WE WILL ALL WALK AWAY AND PAT OURSELVES ON THE BACK AND SAY, GOOD JOB, ALBUQUERQUE, BUT IT IS NOT GOING MAKE A DIFFERENCE.
ALSO BRINGING THEM BACK, THEY DON'T COME BACK AS BEAT COPS.
THEY RETIRE AND THEY WANT TO COME BACK INTO WHAT THEY WERE DOING AND MAKE MORE MONEY TO DO IT.
NOT THAT THEY DON'T DESERVE SOME MORE MONEY, IT IS THAT NOW WE ARE DISTANCING PROVIDING YOUNGER OFFICERS BECAUSE YOU'RE LIMITING THEIR CAREER PATH.
YOU ARE LIMITING WHERE THEY CAN GO.
I RESPECT REPRESENTATIVE REHM FOR THROWING SOMETHING OUT THERE, BUT, REALLY, BECAUSE THIS IS AN ALBUQUERQUE ISSUE, I DON'T THINK WE NEED TO TAKE IT TO THE LEGISLATURE.
WE NEED TO LOOK AT WHAT IS CAUSING THE CULTURE AT THE CITY OF ALBUQUERQUE TO MAKE THEM WANT TO RETIRE SO SOON.
Gene: THE GOVERNOR WON'T SAY WHETHER OR NOT SHE SUPPORTS THIS IDEA AND SHE HAS CONTROL OVER WHAT ISSUES CAN BE ADDED TO THE CALL, OF COURSE, DURING THIS 30 DAYS COMING UP.
DO YOU THINK THIS MEASURE WILL MAKE HER CALL?
Tom: IT HAS POTENTIAL.
FROM AN OPTICS PERSPECTIVE IT HAS A LOT OF CURB APPEAL.
IT IS SOMETHING THAT WILL GET A LOT OF PEOPLE TALKING ABOUT PUBLIC SAFETY AND SPECIFICALLY IN ALBUQUERQUE.
SO, I THINK IT DOES HAVE A LOT OF CURB APPEAL.
WHETHER OR NOT IT MAKES CALL IS A WHOLE OTHER ISSUE.
PLAYING OFF WHAT I HEARD BOTH REBECCA AND ERIC SAYING, IF PEOPLE WANT TO RETURN TO THE FORCE, LET'S PROVIDE A MEANS FOR THEM TO RETURN TO THE FORCE BECAUSE GRANTED, WILL THEY WANT TO RETURN IS THE WHOLE OTHER ISSUE, BECAUSE IF THEY HAVE ALREADY RETIRED EARLY FROM SOMETHING OVER A PHILOSOPHICAL ISSUE, NOT A MONEY ISSUE, WHAT HAS CHANGED PHILOSOPHICALLY THAT WILL GET THEM TO SAY, YOU KNOW WHAT, MAYBE I WILL RETURN TO THE ALBUQUERQUE POLICE DEPARTMENT, MAYBE I WILL RETURN TO X, OR Y OR Z.
OR THE THING IS I LIKE IT BECAUSE IT PROVIDES AN OPPORTUNITY FOR INSTITUTIONAL KNOWLEDGE TO COME BACK INTO THE POLICE DEPARTMENT.
YOU KNOW, WITH A LOT OF NEW RECRUITS, A LOT OF NEW OFFICERS, YOU KNOW, WHICH ARE ALL VERY WELL TRAINED, I THINK THAT SOMETIMES HAVING SOMEBODY WHO HAS THAT INSTITUTIONAL KNOWLEDGE COME BACK AND SHARE INSIGHTS, I THINK THAT IS A GOOD THING.
BUT HAVING A PROCESS, I DON'T THINK WE ARE HURT AS A RESULT OF HAVING A PROCESS TO PROVIDE A PATHWAY TO ALLOW SOME OF THE OFFICERS WHO WANT TO RETURN, TO RETURN.
Gene: ERIC, THE POLICE UNION SPOKESPERSON HERE IN ALBUQUERQUE HAS COME OUT AGAINST THE PLAN SAYING RETIRED OFFICERS RE-ENTER WORKFORCE AT HIGHER LEVELS, AS REBECCA MENTIONED, THEREFORE STUNTING THE CAREER PROGRESS OF YOUNGER OFFICERS BUT SUPPORTERS SAY THE IDEA, WITHOUT A MOVE LIKE THIS, WILL HAVE TO GO OUT OF STATE EVEN MORE TO FIND MORE OFFICERS TO FILL POSITIONS.
THAT INSTITUTIONAL KNOWLEDGE ABOUT THE COMMUNITY THAT TOM MENTIONED WON'T BE HAD WITH PEOPLE COMING IN FROM THE OUTSIDE.
DOES THAT MAKE SENSE, WHERE THE POLICE UNION IS COMING FROM?
Eric: NO, BUT I GENERALLY HAVE A HARD TIME UNDERSTANDING WHERE SHAUN SEAN WILLOUGHBY IS COMING FROM MOST OF THE TIME BUT I HAVE TO SAY THAT I AGREE WITH HIM, WHICH IS RARE, THAT WE HAVE TO PROVIDE SOME OPPORTUNITIES.
THIS IS A TOUGH JOB, RIGHT?
ESPECIALLY WITH EVERYTHING GOING ON, SO, IF WE WANT TO GET OUR BEST AND BRIGHTEST, WE WANT PEOPLE TO MAKE THIS A CAREER DECISION, THEY HAVE TO BE ABLE TO SUPPORT THEIR FAMILIES AND FEEL LIKE THEY HAVE A CAREER PATH.
I THINK I MIGHT JUST AGREE WITH SHAUN WILLOUGHBY ABOUT WHETHER THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, THE REFORMS THEY ARE TALKING ABOUT, SHOULD BE IMPLEMENTED AND HOW THEY SHOULD BE IMPLEMENTED.
HE WOULD LIKE THEM TO GO AWAY.
I THINK WE NEED TO CHANGE THE CULTURE OF THE DEPARTMENT.
BUT IF WE USE IT AS AN OPPORTUNITY TO BRING IN A LOT OF NEW FOLKS, DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVE, YOUNGER FOLKS, THERE IS PLENTY OF YOUNG PEOPLE IN ALBUQUERQUE AND AROUND THE STATE WHO WOULD LOVE TO BE IN A VERY SORT OF ENLIGHTENED POLICE DEPARTMENT WHERE THEY CAN REALLY HELP THE COMMUNITY.
THAT IS WHY MOST PEOPLE GO INTO IT.
THE PEOPLE WHO GO INTO IT TO SHOOT FOLKS ARE THE PEOPLE WHO CREATE THE BAD REPUTATION FOR MOST OF LAW ENFORCEMENT, RIGHT?
YOU WANT TO MINIMIZE THE INCENTIVE FOR THOSE FOLKS AND YOU WANT THE FOLKS WHO ARE THINKING ABOUT THE MILITARY, THINKING ABOUT TEACHING, ABOUT MAYBE SOCIAL WORK, MAYBE THINKING ABOUT LIKE, WHAT CAN I DO TO HELP MY COMMUNITY, AND I AM FROM HERE AND I WANT TO DO THAT IN MY COMMUNITY.
HOW DO WE MAKE THIS A REALLY GOOD DECISION FOR THEM AND THAT IS WHAT WE SHOULD BE TALKING ABOUT, NOT ABOUT BRINGING BACK OLD TIMERS, NOT ABOUT BRINGING PEOPLE FROM OUT OF STATE.
I THINK WE HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO REALLY REBUILD THE DEPARTMENT IN A WAY THAT WILL HELP US OVERCOME THE CHALLENGES WE HAVE HAD FOR, FRANKLY, A GENERATION.
Gene: THANK YOU ALL FOR YOUR RESEARCH AND THOUGHTFUL COMMENTS.
THIS WEEK, BE SURE TO LET US KNOW WHAT YOU THINK ABOUT ANY OF THE TOPICS T HE LINE COVERED THIS WEEK ON FACEBOOK, TWITTER OR INSTAGRAM PAGES.
FINALLY TONIGHT, ALBUQUERQUE CITY COUNCILOR CYNTHIA BORREGO SHARES HER THOUGHTS ON THE STADIUM BONDS PROPOSAL SAYING IT IS IN THE HANDS OF THE VOTERS, AS IT SHOULD BE.
Borrego: GOOD EVENING.
I AM CYNTHIA BORREGO.
I AM THE CITY COUNCIL PRESIDENT.
I AM ALSO THE CITY COUNCILOR FOR THE NORTHWEST MESA, DISTRICT 5.
THIS EVENING I AM HERE TO TALK WITH YOU A LITTLE BIT ABOUT WHAT IS ON THE BALLOT FOR THE PROPOSED STADIUM.
WHAT IS ON THE BALLOT IS BASICALLY AN INITIATIVE AS TO WHETHER OR NOT THE CITY MOVES FORWARD ON 50 MILLION-DOLLARS OF BOND MONEY TO BUILD -- TO INVEST AND BUILD THE STADIUM.
THERE WOULD, OF COURSE, BE A MATCH FROM THE DEVELOPER IF THAT DOES PASS.
THE BOND FUNDING IS BASICALLY GROSS RECEIPTS TAX BOND FUNDS AND THOSE ARE SLATED TO BUILD CAPITAL PROJECTS.
SO, IF THE STADIUM INITIATIVE IS VOTED DOWN, THEN WE WOULD MOVE FORWARD WITH OTHER TYPES OF CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT.
IF IT IS VOTED UP, THEN THE CITY WOULD PROCEED TO LOOK AT WHERE THE STADIUM IS BEST SUITED AND THERE WAS A STUDY DONE BY THE CITY.
THE CITY IDENTIFIED IN THAT STUDY THREE DIFFERENT AREAS THAT WOULD BE PROBABLY LOCATED IN THE DOWNTOWN BUT I THINK IT IS IMPORTANT AS A CITY PLANNER THAT WE HAVE ALL INITIATIVES ON THE TABLE AND THAT WE LOOK AT ALL AREAS.
THAT WOULD INCLUDE TRAFFIC, PARKING, ACCESS, YOU KNOW, SOCIOECONOMIC ISSUES AND FRAGILITY OF NEIGHBORHOODS.
I THINK IT IS IMPORTANT THAT WE KEEP AN EYE ON THIS REFERENDUM AND DETERMINE WHETHER OR NOT WE MOVE FORWARD WITH IT OR NOT AND MY PARTICULAR STANCE ON THIS, BECAUSE I WAS ASKED THE QUESTION, IS DO I SUPPORT A STADIUM.
I THINK IN THE LONG-TERM AS A CITY PLANNER THIS POSITIONS ALBUQUERQUE IN PROBABLY A REALLY GOOD PLACE BUT IT IS UP TO THE VOTERS.
Gene: EARLY VOTING CONTINUES THROUGH SATURDAY AND ELECTION DAY IS OF COURSE NEXT TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 2.
A REMINDER THAT YOU CAN TAKE ADVANTAGE OF SAME DAY VOTER REGISTRATION ONLY IN THE EARLY VOTING PERIOD SO DON'T EXPECT TO WALK UP NEXT TUESDAY WITH THE IDEA YOU CAN REGISTER AND CAST YOUR BALLOT.
HOWEVER YOU TAKE PART IN THE PROCESS, ENCOURAGE ALL OF YOU TO GET OUT THERE AND MAKE YOUR VOICE HEARD.
WE ALSO WANT TO TAKE A MINUTE TO BID FAREWELL TO SENIOR PRODUCER MATT GRUBS WHO IS OFF TO HIS NEXT ADVENTURE.
WE ARE SAD TO SEE HIM GO, BUT GLAD HE WILL BE IMPACTING JOURNALISM IN HIS NEW ROLE AT KOBTV.
MATT HAS BEEN A VALUABLE MEMBER OF THE TEAM FOR THE LAST SEVERAL YEARS.
WE WILL MISS HIS THOUGHTFUL APPROACH TO COVERING STORIES SO IMPACTFUL TO THE ENTIRE STATE.
WE KNOW YOU JOIN US IN WISHING HIM WELL.
SO, UNTIL NEXT TIME, THANKS FOR STAYING INFORMED AND ENGAGED.
SEE YOU AGAIN NEXT WEEK, IN FOCUS.
- News and Public Affairs
Top journalists deliver compelling original analysis of the hour's headlines.
- News and Public Affairs
FRONTLINE is investigative journalism that questions, explains and changes our world.
Support for PBS provided by:
New Mexico In Focus is a local public television program presented by NMPBS